Archive for The Avengers

The Avengers assemble, and it fucking ROCKS

Posted in Movies, Reviews with tags , , , , , , on May 2, 2012 by Sarah

For a discussion on Joss Whedon and why he’s good for film, please go here.

If you’re sitting there going, “I don’t like comic book/superhero movies, so I don’t care about The Avengers,” well fine, but just know you’re passing up the most fun that can be had at the movies this year. The Avengers, written and directed by Whedon, is not flawless. There are some trouble spots. But when stacked against the sheer pleasure derived in watching, those issues ultimately don’t matter. Because even with a couple squiffy points, The Avengers is not a mess. It should be, but it isn’t. It works on nearly every level and is a testament to a great director working with a great group of actors and a studio that knew when to get out of the way and let the creatives be creative.

We already know 99% of the characters in The Avengers. We know Tony Stark/Iron Man, we know Thor and Steve Rogers/Captain America and Bruce Banner/the Hulk (even if we are getting a new take on Banner, courtesy Mark Ruffalo). We got an idea of Natasha Romanov/Black Widow in Iron Man 2, who here has a much-expanded role (and you won’t hate Scarlett Johansson!). The only new Avenger is Jeremy Renner’s Clint Barton/Hawkeye, of whom we only got the barest of glimpses in last summer’s Thor. So the movie assumes that we know these people and doesn’t waste time with re-introducing them. In Renner’s case this is slightly problematic as we really do not know Barton as a person, and he spends the first half of the movie as Loki’s bitch, so there’s never a strong connection with him. Like, if he never came back I don’t think we’d miss him. Still, if you’ve missed any of the previous character movies, you won’t be left adrift by The Avengers. Whedon’s script handles characterization in very compact increments so that we get a clear picture of each person and their relationships very quickly and with minimal fuss. It’s a real accomplishment of writing.

The plot is similarly compartmentalized, centering around the Tesseract, that glowy cube from Captain America, which if you didn’t see it doesn’t matter because one line establishes that this an Important Thing That Everyone Wants, and a responding one-liner from Rogers conveys that it is also Very Bad News. The plot in barest form is that SHIELD is trying to use the Tesseract as a new energy source but they accidentally summon Loki (Tom Hiddleston, War Horse), Thor’s half-demented little brother, from whatever space-pocket he fell into at the end of Thor. Loki immediately destroys everything, mind-controls Hawkeye into being his bitch, and absconds with the Tesseract. So Nick Fury (Samuel L. Jackson) assembles his Avengers and then proceeds two hours of straight ass kicking. Acts one and two are basically Avenger-on-Avenger violence and act three is Loki and his space army vs. the Avengers, leveling most of mid and lower Manhattan in the process. IT WILL ROCK YOUR FACE OFF.

What isn’t working in this movie is the story structure of acts one and two. It plays out more like a series of vignettes rather than a cohesive narrative, although I really don’t know how you do any better, given that you have to get six different people in the same place. Whedon uses Loki as his means of bringing out each Avenger, giving them all a scene opposite Hiddleston, who plays Loki with a scary mix of confidence, aloofness and insanity. He’s a great villain and Hiddleston is clearly having a ball playing him, which makes him incredibly fun to watch. His best scene is easily the confrontation between Loki and the Black Widow, and damn if Johansson doesn’t really deliver as the uber-spy Natasha. They’re clearly sowing seeds for a potential Black Widow movie, and while I don’t think we need it, I’d watch it if Whedon was in charge. Things even out in act three, though, as the Avengers get to New York to try and stop Loki’s space army. I cannot stress enough how amazing the assault on New York is. Each Avenger has a chance to shine and everyone, even the ridiculous bow-and-arrow-wielding Hawkeye, contributes in a meaningful way. And for all the chaos that is raining down, the action is executed clearly—it isn’t a headache-inducing mess like Transformers.

Act three is also when the two Avengers who struggle most with characterization get their shit together and deliver, that being Chris Evans as Captain America and Renner as Hawkeye. Captain America is a challenge because he’s so boring and such a do-gooder that there’s no internal conflict from which to derive drama. Evans does his level best through the first half of the movie but it’s only when Cap begins clicking along with Stark that he feels like a fully realized character. There’s just a hint of sarcasm in Evans’ delivery when he deals with Stark that serves Cap well and should be remembered for Captain America 2. Letting the inner cranky old man out of Cap makes him more interesting. As for Hawkeye, when he is finally back in his right mind, Renner delivers as a stone-cold assassin fueled by a well of cold rage. I don’t think I’d want to see a Hawkeye movie, but as a dude who lurks on the periphery he’s very effective.

But, as is always the case with RDJ, it’s Tony Stark who rules the roost. He is at his sarcastic, bitchy best, and even manages a little character arc that sets up Iron Man 3 without being obnoxious. And RDJ was right—bringing in Pepper Potts (Gwyneth Paltrow) was a good call as she humanizes Stark and makes him more relatable. Without her he’d be an insufferable know-it-all but at key moments Stark turns to Pepper and reveals the traumatized man underneath the armor both real and emotional. His storyline is easily the most satisfying of the movie, mostly because Stark is one of those internal-conflict characters that is capable of creating his own drama. He doesn’t need Loki or anyone else to propel his actions. Stealing the show, though, is Ruffalo as Bruce Banner. Like Hawkeye and Widow, I don’t think I need a Ruffalo/Hulk movie (although I’m sure we’ll get one anyway), but as an ensemble player Ruffalo is a stand-out.

The Avengers is awesome. It’s not perfect but it is damn good and is hella fun. That this movie works at all is a testament to Joss Whedon’s skill, but that it is also genuinely funny, sincerely heartfelt and some of the best ass-kickery you’ll see on screen is what makes it more than just a superhero movie. It is THE superhero movie.

The Avengers will melt your face with awesome

Posted in Movies, Reviews with tags , , , , , , on April 30, 2012 by Sarah

So I saw The Avengers and it was pretty much the most awesome movie I’ve seen in ages. And I’m not exactly sure how to review it because a lot of the joy of watching is just being amazed by the various things happening on screen and going, “Oh my gosh that! And THAT!” So I’ve decided to do two reviews and you can choose your own adventure, basically. This is the short-form, spoiler-free review, and later in the week I’ll do a proper analysis. Yes/yes?

For discussion re: Joss Whedon is our Nerd King, please go here.

Yes, it’s good. Really good. As good as advertised. The Avengers is two hours and twenty minutes of straight ass kicking. Remember the Tesseract, that glowy cube from Captain America? Yeah, everyone in the universe wants it, literally. That and ass kicking, more ASS KICKING and then forty-five minutes of ASS KICKING is pretty much the plot. Everyone is good. Each Avenger is perfectly realized, everyone gets a good line and everyone has a moment with Loki, who is off the chain. Tom Hiddleston (War Horse, Thor) isn’t chewing scenery so much as devouring it whole. He’s having a grand old time and you can tell and it makes him enormously fun to watch. Whedon’s direction is confident and assured, and he frames his actions sequences so well that no matter how crazy things get, you can track what’s happening and who is beating whose ass at any given moment. Mark Ruffalo takes over as Bruce Banner/The Hulk and he knocks it out of the park—this is easily the best iteration of the Hulk yet. And the writing is deft and funny and The Avengers earns its humor honestly. You will laugh, a lot.

So that’s the spoiler-free rundown on The Avengers, which is a great start to summer movie season 2012. You don’t have to be a comic book nerd to enjoy it—this is classic summer popcorn fare at its best. And now here is a gallery of out-of-context quotes that are still making me laugh.

When it comes to female superheroes, it’s quality, not quantity

Posted in Movies, Uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , on April 11, 2012 by Sarah

This is going to get very nerdy.

The L stop near my home in Chicago is plastered with Avengers posters in advance of the movie hitting theaters on May 4. As I was studying the display, I thought about how much Scarlett Johansson stands out, and no, not just because her little gun looks ridiculous next to Thor’s hammer and Iron Man and The Hulk. No, I was thinking about how, as the only woman featured in the marketing campaign, Johansson solely represents what women will be in Joss Whedon’s version of the Avengers universe (good thing Whedon has a history of creating intricate, strong female characters). What I get from Black Widow, the superhero Johansson plays, in the ads is “sexy but functional”. Her leather body suit, though tight and unzipped, doesn’t actually show any cleavage. It’s no more exploitative than Jeremy Renner’s Hawkeye costume or Chris Hemsworth’s Thor getup, which leaves their awesome guns bare.

The other woman featured in The Avengers, though not in the advertising, is SHIELD agent Maria Hill (Cobie Smulders, How I Met Your Mother)—you can see a clip of her here. And that’s pretty much it. Two women. I’m sure that Gwyneth Paltrow will make an appearance as Pepper Potts at some point, but she’s not featured throughout the film like Black Widow and Agent Hill. Then I started wondering if that was an issue, that there are only two women in The Avengers. Comic books are and always have been ripe with interesting, strong female characters. Having only two in the movie seems like tokenism—here you go boys, here are some hot chicks to look at. But then I thought about the five X-Men movies and realized that though they feature a plethora of female superheroes, most of them are useless. Storm is so awesome in the comics that I always wanted to be her when we played X-Men as kids, but in the movies she’s best known for Halle Berry’s series of increasingly awful wigs. The best we got from X-Men was Jean Grey and Mystique and that’s, well, two.

So it’s quality, then, not quantity when it comes to female superheroes in movies. I’ll take two great heroines over nine useless bimbos any day of the week. But why is it so important that we have “good” female superheroes? Well, empowerment, sure. Twenty years ago when I was a kid (OMG I’M OLD), no one ever challenged my right to run alongside the boys in the neighborhood, pretending to shoot lightning bolts out of my hands. But looking at it now, I think who we’re really empowering with female superheroes are little boys. They grow up reading comics featuring an array of strong, ass-kicking women who may be scantily clad, but they’re also shooting death lasers out of their eyes and sometimes they even save—or defeat—the heroes. Boys grow up accepting that women can be beautiful and badass, and that they are equal partners in whatever death-defying heroics you’re reading about that week.

And as for the “scantily clad” bit, yes, female superheroes are inherently sexual. For the most part, they’re drawn by men for the male gaze. But in the realm of the comic book, it doesn’t feel like objectification. If in The Avengers movie we’re treated to the sight of Johansson’s jiggling breasts, it comes simultaneously as she beats the shit out of a couple dudes (while she’s tied to a chair). It says, “Yes, boys, my boobs are bouncy, but I can choke you out so watch yourself.” It’s the unification of female power and female sexuality and it presents it in a way that does not scare boys, but subconsciously programs them to find strength and independence sexy and desirable. I might be reaching, but when I think of the comic geeks I know and the kind of women they’re attracted to, I think there’s something to it. They grew up reading about these incredibly self-determined women and now as adults, they’re to a one attracted to free-thinking, independent women. It’s not universal I’m sure—nothing ever is—but it can’t hurt that boys are exposed to a system in which female power and sexuality are treated as inherently the same.

The man directing The Avengers, Joss Whedon, is a comic geek from way back and he’s built his career on strong female characters like Buffy. Even though I’m not a huge Johansson fan, I’m interested to see how Whedon makes use of her in The Avengers, especially since she was little more than an eye-candy afterthought in Iron Man 2. It’s only 66 seconds, but the clip of Black Widow linked above made me happy. There’s some wry humor, sure, but the key to me is the reason she’s on the phone. Hawkeye (Renner) is in trouble and the Black Widow needs to go save him. This is exactly what I’m talking about. There’s Johansson with her boobs out, but she’s also being set up as the savior of an equally powerful male counterpart. It’s a very fine line to walk between celebration and exploitation but I feel like Whedon is managing it. And that’s why I’ll take The Avengers and its two female superheroes over anything starring a bunch of pointless dolls. At her best, the female superhero shows us that a woman can be beautiful, sexy, and desirable while simultaneously being independent, strong, and capable.

The State of Superhero Nation

Posted in Movies with tags , , , , , on February 15, 2011 by Sarah

It’s been a busy couple weeks in superhero movie news. Remember in the early 2000’s when the grown-ups thought superhero movies were a fad? Ten years later and there’s something like 917 superhero movies coming out over the next couple years. Here’s a rundown on what’s happening with the longest-lasting “fad” (haha, grown-ups are so silly) in cinema.

Spider-Man

Marc Webb’s Spidey reboot got a name—The Amazing Spider-Man—and the first image of Andrew Garfield fully suited-up was released, too. I have been largely indifferent to this project since we just had the Tobey Maguire Spider-Man in the last few years, however, the images both official and unofficial have intrigued me. I LOVE the new Spidey suit. It seems so much more…athletic. More like a second-skin than the previous suit. And comic book nerds are geeking out over the mechanized web shooters Spidey 2.0 is sporting. Apparently this means something but I am not a big enough comic nerd to know what that is, nor do I care enough to look it up. I can wait until the movie explains it to me next year. I do like the idea that Peter Parker is enough of a nerd himself to come up with that, though. I just realized that the guy directing Spider-Man is named “Webb”. Heh.

X-Men: First Class

First came rumblings of trouble, of prolonged reshoots and then Emma Frost (January Jones, Mad Men) dropped a line about their rushed production schedule, though she cast it in a less-disturbing-sounding light. Still, it always kind of unnerves me when the talent starts talking about production in terms of “rushed”, “crazy”, etc, and then ends with, “We should be fine.” The first trailer finally dropped, though, and it’s…not terrible. It’s not great either, not by a long shot. I am merely whelmed. There are individual shots of each mutant—nice. The crew wears a costume derived from the famous “yellow spandex” of the comic series—nice. Michael Fassbender (Jane Eyre, Inglorious Basterds) and James McAvoy (Atonement, our collective dreams) look like the sexy beasts they are—NICE. But um…we’re pretty skint on dialogue, no? And in a two-minute trailer, it takes over thirty seconds before we get to actual stuff happening in this movie, and not stuff that happened in the first X-Men from a decade ago.

I’m in wait-and-see mode with this one. Because that trailer, while well made, is engineered to show off the good while hiding the bad but it seems to be having some trouble holding back the bad (where is the dialogue?!). In other X-News, Darren Aronofsky is prepping The Wolverine for filming and Black Swan’s Oscar-nominated cinematographer, Matthew Libatique, is on board. Hopefully this won’t suck as bad as Wolverine: THIS NEVER HAPPENED did, but the comics lost my interest when they got into Logan’s time in Japan which doesn’t bode well for the movie.

The Avengers, et al

Making fanboy dreams come true, Joss Whedon has included The Avengers in New Mexico’s “Film and Media Day”, which includes an open casting call for several productions. It’s going down tomorrow morning in Santa Fe—please someone go there and take some pictures for hilarity’s posterity’s sake. Also in Avengers news, Variety reported that How I Met Your Mother’s Cobie Smulders (greatest name EVER) has been tapped to play Maria Hill, Nick Fury’s assistant/underling/something at SHIELD. I like Smulders a lot. She’s one of the last reasons left to be watching HIMYM these days. She’ll be a good foil for Samuel L. Jackson’s Fury—certainly better than boring Scarlett Johansson was.

As for the two Avenger movies due this summer, Thor continues to uninterest me and Captain America got a kickass and funny fan-made trailer parody.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 187 other followers