<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Welcome to the second annual Ethel Awards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cinesnark.com/2012/02/22/welcome-to-the-second-annual-ethel-awards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cinesnark.com/2012/02/22/welcome-to-the-second-annual-ethel-awards/</link>
	<description>Movies with a bite.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 22:26:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Hurt Locker and how movies age &#171; CineSnark</title>
		<link>http://cinesnark.com/2012/02/22/welcome-to-the-second-annual-ethel-awards/#comment-6039</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Hurt Locker and how movies age &#171; CineSnark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 17:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cinesnark.wordpress.com/?p=3335#comment-6039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] not give out filmmaking awards until five years after the fact. This is the reasoning behind The Ethels, and it’s one of my guiding principles for movies in general. Of course there’s an element of [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] not give out filmmaking awards until five years after the fact. This is the reasoning behind The Ethels, and it’s one of my guiding principles for movies in general. Of course there’s an element of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://cinesnark.com/2012/02/22/welcome-to-the-second-annual-ethel-awards/#comment-4317</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 02:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cinesnark.wordpress.com/?p=3335#comment-4317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love O Brother. It holds up and I still have the soundtrack on pretty regular rotation. 

And I agree with Nikki, Almost Famous still holds up. I&#039;m a huge music fan [especially music from a certain time frame that Crowe also loves] so I wonder if that makes a difference.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love O Brother. It holds up and I still have the soundtrack on pretty regular rotation. </p>
<p>And I agree with Nikki, Almost Famous still holds up. I&#8217;m a huge music fan [especially music from a certain time frame that Crowe also loves] so I wonder if that makes a difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikki</title>
		<link>http://cinesnark.com/2012/02/22/welcome-to-the-second-annual-ethel-awards/#comment-4267</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nikki]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2012 02:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cinesnark.wordpress.com/?p=3335#comment-4267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love Ellen Burstyn- requiem was so messed up and disturbing, it is the type of movie and performance you don&#039;t forget. As much as I like Roberts, I remember very little of Erin Brockovich  save for the fact that Julia played a spunky, compassionate woman who people doubted. 

I totally disagree with you about Almost Famous. To me , it still holds up beautifully.  I thought the work of the entire cast was excellent and their is a sweetness to the film that really shows what Crowe does at his best.

Loved, loved, loved O brother! Thought it was robbed and everything from the soundtrack to the beautiful visuals and the masterful way they modernized a really dense text was amazing. It still stands to me as the best Cohen brothers work(well that and Fargo).  And Clooney is so compelling in that movie.  I didn&#039;t mind that Crowe won though because it was his, &#039;I owe you one Oscar&#039; because they robbed him for the Insider.  That is pretty much how the Oscars role- rarely do you win for the work you did that year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love Ellen Burstyn- requiem was so messed up and disturbing, it is the type of movie and performance you don&#8217;t forget. As much as I like Roberts, I remember very little of Erin Brockovich  save for the fact that Julia played a spunky, compassionate woman who people doubted. </p>
<p>I totally disagree with you about Almost Famous. To me , it still holds up beautifully.  I thought the work of the entire cast was excellent and their is a sweetness to the film that really shows what Crowe does at his best.</p>
<p>Loved, loved, loved O brother! Thought it was robbed and everything from the soundtrack to the beautiful visuals and the masterful way they modernized a really dense text was amazing. It still stands to me as the best Cohen brothers work(well that and Fargo).  And Clooney is so compelling in that movie.  I didn&#8217;t mind that Crowe won though because it was his, &#8216;I owe you one Oscar&#8217; because they robbed him for the Insider.  That is pretty much how the Oscars role- rarely do you win for the work you did that year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emster</title>
		<link>http://cinesnark.com/2012/02/22/welcome-to-the-second-annual-ethel-awards/#comment-4259</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 02:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cinesnark.wordpress.com/?p=3335#comment-4259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d be interested to see a study on who wins acting Oscars for best campaign rather than best performance. Case 1: Julia Roberts. Case 2: Roberto Benigni?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be interested to see a study on who wins acting Oscars for best campaign rather than best performance. Case 1: Julia Roberts. Case 2: Roberto Benigni?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marie</title>
		<link>http://cinesnark.com/2012/02/22/welcome-to-the-second-annual-ethel-awards/#comment-4251</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[marie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 22:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cinesnark.wordpress.com/?p=3335#comment-4251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes please for Amores Perros.. kinda hated that he repeated the 3 separate stories with 1 connection plot with 21 grams and babel, but inarritu really aced it with this one..and yeah, gael garcia bernal!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes please for Amores Perros.. kinda hated that he repeated the 3 separate stories with 1 connection plot with 21 grams and babel, but inarritu really aced it with this one..and yeah, gael garcia bernal!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
