<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 10 Movies of the Decade: 2000-2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cinesnark.com/2010/01/03/top-10-movies-of-the-decade-2000-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cinesnark.com/2010/01/03/top-10-movies-of-the-decade-2000-2009/</link>
	<description>Movies with a bite.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 16:34:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Hurt Locker and how movies age &#171; CineSnark</title>
		<link>http://cinesnark.com/2010/01/03/top-10-movies-of-the-decade-2000-2009/#comment-6035</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Hurt Locker and how movies age &#171; CineSnark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 17:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cinesnark.wordpress.com/?p=49#comment-6035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] things I wrote on Cinesnark, over two years ago, and damn if I didn’t omit The Hurt Locker from the Best of 2000-2009. It didn’t even make the “near misses”! (In my defense, it did make the Best of 2009, and I [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] things I wrote on Cinesnark, over two years ago, and damn if I didn’t omit The Hurt Locker from the Best of 2000-2009. It didn’t even make the “near misses”! (In my defense, it did make the Best of 2009, and I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
